Dorthea Shephard

These days, many people, which includes amazingly nearly all practising doctors, still cling onto the existing dogma that Testosterone Replacement Therapy (TRT) for older men is not safe and also leads to an increased incidence of prostate cancer. They accomplish this despite the point that there's not a single shred of proof to support this folktale and thus there never was.

Where did the figment of the medical imagination come from then you may well ask? Search the medical literature as you might, I promise you you won't think of a single peer review paper which supports the belief that improving a male's testosterone levels enhances his chances for developing prostate cancer or some other cancer for that matter. They just are not there. They're not there because the scientific evidence for them isn't there.

However, here's where many doctors may still be mixed up. In case a man produces metastatic prostate cancer one of the first lines of treatment for him will be to knock Find out how (check this link right here now) all the testosterone of his. Today this's ordinarily achieved quite easily with medicines as Finasteride. As soon as this particular patient's testosterone levels are lowered to near zero levels he will go in at least a short-term remission from his prostate cancer. Hence, if suprisingly low levels of testosterone are temporarily curative of prostate cancer then certainly it makes sense that incredibly high amounts are causative. Would be that not just good sense?

No, sorry, that is not just good sense and it most definitely isn't scientific. This particular sort of woolly thinking - that if the lack of food is curative then a great deal of the very same thing should be causative, is called a corollary. Corollaries are typically used in religious debate and mathematical theory. Corollaries haven't any place in science and certainly no place in medication. They often leads you astray & confuse you as clearly they actually do in this instance.

Besides, this's likewise worth noting. Prostate cancer is predominately an ailment of older males with declining testosterone levels. It's not at all an ailment of younger men with high levels of this sex hormone circulating in the blood of theirs. Just how then are you able to argue that testosterone replacement therapy might be conducive to prostate cancer? Surely if anything the contrary would be the case although I'm not attempting to make that case with these.

Let us then simply place the final nail in the coffin of this pishogue about testosterone causing cancer. A recently conducted research into the security of testosterone replacement therapy, performed by M.R. Feneley as well as M. Carruthers at The Institute of Urology and Nephrology University College, London and you don't receive much grander than that; realized thus:

The incidence of prostate cancer in this group of males (1,500) taken care of with testosterone over a lot of years was equivalent to which expected in the general population.

While I am at it next, let me simply dispel another medical myth, popular amongst physicians regarding TRT. Doctors continue to hang on to the fallacy which, to figure out which males must be considered for TRT, it's always to first of all get blood for hormonal level assay. This's no longer the truth. A recent study conducted by Trinick, Carruthers, Wheeler et al realized as follows: